Skip to content

A Comparison in Atrial fibrillation monitoring with new Frontier X Plus

Validation study of Frontier X Plus (FX+) device, Recording Electrocardiogram (ECG) for Rhythm Analysis in patients with and without Atrial Fibrillation (AF)

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2023/03/050757
Enrollment
102
Registered
2023-03-16
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2023-11-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: I489- Unspecified atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter

Interventions

Control Intervention1: 12-Lead ECG: All used for screening patients for their ECG patterns (30-seconds,twice) and simultaneously, with 2-devices at a time. One sub-group of patients that need 24-hour

Sponsors

Fourth Frontier Technologies Pvt. Ltd., (FFTPL)
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Age: Adults ( > 18 years of age), both genders 2. Subjects presenting in the Outpatient department(OPD) with a known case of AF and/or patients admitted as Inpatients for AF by their treating cardiologist with an indication for a 12-Lead ECG or 24-hour ECG Holter monitoring. 3. Subjects presenting in the Outpatient department (OPD) with no known AF and/or patients with suspicious arrhythmic episodes were admitted as Out-/In-patients by their treating cardiologist with an indication for a 12-Lead ECG or 24-hour ECG Holter monitoring.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Subjects with a critical underlying cardiac problem. 2. Subjects on a ventilator or any other kind of life support system. 3. Subjects assessed to be in a serious or life-threatening situation due to any cause. 4. Subject with a chest deformity or skin

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Validate the reliability of Frontier X Plus (FX+) to produce a clinically equivalent waveform in agreement to a gold-standard 12-lead ECG’s Lead-1 reference by comparing a. Quantitative analysis of R-R intervals of FX+ versus 12-lead ECG b. Qualified cardiologist performs naked-eye review and comparison of date and time-matched ECG waveform segments from FX+ versus 12-lead ECG. Evaluate the Sensitivity and Specificity of the AF detection by Frontier X Plus (FX+) a. Comparative analysis of 2 separate 30-second SPOT rhythm analysis for AF detection obtained simultaneously from FX+ along with the gold standard 12-lead ECG followed by 2 separate 30-second recordings from FX+ and a US FDA-cleared wearable, Kardia Monitor (KM) AliveCor (cleared to display and detect AF and normal sinus rhythm) worn simultaneously. b. Comparative 24-hour CONTINUOUS Rhythm analysis for AF detection obtained simultaneously from FX+ and gold-standard 12-channel ECG Holter.Timepoint: 30 seconds - spot checks 24 hour - continuous checks

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of detecting, Normal Sinus Rhythm, Sinus Tachycardia, Sinus Bradycardia, other rhythms and noisy signals/inconclusive/unreadable from all the ECG recordings obtained both on SPOT check and CONTINUOUS monitoring (using techniques mentioned in primary outcome #2, above.)Timepoint: 30 seconds - spot checks 24 hour - continuous checks

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Sathish S Reddy

Sri Jayadeva Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences and Research

drsathishsep76@gmail.com9632550902

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026