Comparing Two Different Regional Anaesthetic Techniques With Standard IV Analgesic Technique For Post-Operative Pain Management In Patients Undergoing Laproscopic Cholecystectomy.

A Randomized Controlled Prospective Clinical Study Of Ultrasound Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Transversus Abdominis Plane Block For Post Operative Analgesia In Patients Undergoing Laproscopic Cholecystectomy.

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2023/03/050416

Enrollment

111

Registered

2023-03-06

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2024-04-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical

Interventions

Intervention1: ERECTOR SPINAE PLANE BLOCK: Erector Spinae Plane (ESP) Block Is An Interfascial Plane Block Where A Local Anaesthetic Is Injected In Plane In The Erector Spinae Muscle. This block will

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: ASA physical status I-II

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Allergy to the study drug 2. Bleeding disorders 3. Inability to visualize the plane on USG 4. Patient using chronic analgesic medication 5. Psychiatric disorder 6. Contraindication to regional anaesthesia 7. Patient refusal 8. Cardiorespiratory disorder (e.g bronchial asthma,bradyarrythmias,heart 9. Block, CAD) 10. Hepatic , renal and neurological disease 11. Emergency operation.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
1.To evaluate and compare pain intensity after erector spinae plane block and transversus abdominis plane block. Assessment of pain was done using NRS score. 2.To evaluate and compare the time of first analgesic demand (hours) and the total amount of rescue analgesic consumption during the first 24 hours of postoperative period. Timepoint: Assessment was done using NRS both at rest and on movement immediately and then at 15 min, 30 min, 45 min, 60 min, second hour, fourth hour, sixth hour, eighth hour, tenth hour,12th hour, and 24th hours postoperative.	—

Measure

Time frame

1.To evaluate and compare pain intensity after erector spinae plane block and transversus abdominis plane block. Assessment of pain was done using NRS score. 2.To evaluate and compare the time of first analgesic demand (hours) and the total amount of rescue analgesic consumption during the first 24 hours of postoperative period. Timepoint: Assessment was done using NRS both at rest and on movement immediately and then at 15 min, 30 min, 45 min, 60 min, second hour, fourth hour, sixth hour, eighth hour, tenth hour,12th hour, and 24th hours postoperative.

—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
1. To compare overall patient satisfaction score using likert verbal rating score among the three groups. Timepoint: A 7-point Likert verbal rating scale will be used to assess patient satisfaction immediately and then at 15 min, 30 min, 45 min, 60 min, second hour, fourth hour, sixth hour, eighth hour, tenth hour,12th hour, and 24th hours postoperative ;2. To compare hemodynamic changes among the three groups. Timepoint: Heart rate and mean arterial pressure will be monitored immediately post op and then at 15 min, 30 min, 45 min, 60 min, second hour, fourth hour, sixth hour, eighth hour, tenth hour,12th hour, and 24th hours postoperative.	—

Measure

Time frame

1. To compare overall patient satisfaction score using likert verbal rating score among the three groups. Timepoint: A 7-point Likert verbal rating scale will be used to assess patient satisfaction immediately and then at 15 min, 30 min, 45 min, 60 min, second hour, fourth hour, sixth hour, eighth hour, tenth hour,12th hour, and 24th hours postoperative ;2. To compare hemodynamic changes among the three groups. Timepoint: Heart rate and mean arterial pressure will be monitored immediately post op and then at 15 min, 30 min, 45 min, 60 min, second hour, fourth hour, sixth hour, eighth hour, tenth hour,12th hour, and 24th hours postoperative.

—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactABHINAV NANDA

Subharti Medical College

28bhawana75@gmail.com8449114984

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026

Comparing Two Different Regional Anaesthetic Techniques With Standard IV Analgesic Technique For Post-Operative Pain Management In Patients Undergoing Laproscopic Cholecystectomy.

Conditions

Related papers

Interventions

Sponsors

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria

Design outcomes

Primary

Secondary

Countries

Contacts

Outcome results