FindTrial
Sign In

Tooth color restoration materials used in class II cavity preparation

Clinical comparative evalution of class II ceramic and composite inlay

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2023/03/050298
Enrollment
30
Registered
2023-03-03
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2023-04-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K029- Dental caries, unspecified

Interventions

Intervention1: Ceramic inlay fabricated with commercially available by ips e. max: At baseline, 3 months, 6 months Control Intervention1: Composite inlay fabricated indirectly in laboratory from the c

Sponsors

Narsinhbhai Patel Dental College And Hospital
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Permanent molar teeth with class II (mesio-occlusal, disto-occlusal) dental caries Teeth with healthy periodontal status Vital teeth Age :- 20 â?? 50 years

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Teeth with necrotic pulp Teeth with large pulp chambers Patients with poor oral hygiene. Patients less than 20 years and more than 50 years Teeth indicated for pulp therapy Patients with any parafunctional habits Patients with any systemic diseases

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Ceramic inlay would show better surface texture and marginal adaptation in class-II indirect restoration as comparedc to composite inlayTimepoint: Baseline, 6 months—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Ceramic inlay would show lesser secondary caries and marginal discoloration as compared to composite inlayTimepoint: Baseline, 6 months—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDR ADITI PATEL

NARSINHBHAI PATEL DENTAL COLLEGE AND HOSPITAL

atturkailash@gmail.com9727752499

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026