FindTrial
Sign In

Comparison of low dose thoracic spinal anesthesia with conventional dose lumbar spinal anaesthesia in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

COMPARISON OF LOW DOSE THORACIC SPINAL ANAESTHESIA WITH CONVENTIONAL DOSE LUMBAR SPINAL ANAESTHESIA IN LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY â?? A DOUBLE BLIND, RANDOMIZED CONTROL TRIAL.

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2023/03/050280
Enrollment
90
Registered
2023-03-02
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2023-04-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical

Interventions

Intervention1: Low dose thoracic spinal anaesthesia: Low dose (1.6 ml of 0.5% heavy bupivacaine). Duration: Patient will be observed for 6 hours Control Intervention1: Conventional dose lumbar spinal

Sponsors

BPS GMC W Khanpur
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: ASA 1 & 2

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Refusal to participate Any contraindication to spinal anaesthesia History of allergy to drug under study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To compare the efficacy in terms of time to reach sensory blockade till T4Timepoint: Tested for loss of cold sensation to spirit swab at 1min.interval till T4 sensory blockade achieved(20 min.)—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Patientâ?? comfort with lesser number of side effectsTimepoint: Throughout duration of surgery—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactNishu Grover

Dept of Anaesthesiology

minkee3@gmail.com9953993573

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026