FindTrial
Sign In

A COMPARISON OF ORDINARY SUPERVISION AND ONLINE SUPERVISION FOR AIM SPECIFIC EXERCISES IN IMPROVING UPPER LIMB FUNCTION IN STROKE PATIENTS

COMPARISON BETWEEN INSTITUTIONAL BASED SUPERVISION AND TELE BASED SUPERVISION FOR TASK ORIENTED EXERCISES ON UPPER LIMB MOTOR PERFORMANCE AND FUNCTIONAL ABILITY AMONG PATIENTS WITH STROKE

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2023/02/050093
Enrollment
62
Registered
2023-02-27
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2023-03-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: G819- Hemiplegia, unspecified

Interventions

Intervention1: task oriented exersices: institutional based supervision and tele based rehabilitation for task oriented exercises on upper limb motor recovery Control Intervention1: task oriented exer

Sponsors

Neha
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1.First-ever ischemic or hemorrhagic (not evacuated) stroke confirmed by neuroimaging (computed tomography, CT or magnetic resonance, MR 2. Patient having stroke from 2 months up to 6 months. 3. Moderate to mild motor impairment (Fugl Meyer Assessment 26-56) 4. Mild to moderate spasticity (modified ashworth scale 5. Sufficient cognitive ability to follow the instructions (mini-mental state examination score >24) 6. Patient with Brunnstrom Score-Stage II and III 7. Willing to participate

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Progressing stroke. 2. Visual problems that might prohibit them performing the task. 3. Excessive joint contracture of UE. 4. Other neurological (Parkinsonism, multiple sclerosis) or psychological. disorders(depression, dementia ),orthopaedic disease (previous fractures,or deformities caused by inflammatory arthopathies such as rheumatoid arthritis) •Received botulinum toxin injections within 3 months

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
1.upper limb motor performance 2. functional abilityTimepoint: 1. at baseline 2. at 4th week 3. at 8th week—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
motor performance of upper limb and functional abilityTimepoint: follow up will be taken after one month of completion of study protocol.—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Aksh Chahal

Maharishi Markandeshwar (DU) university

drakshchahal@gmail.com9711774174

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026