FindTrial
Sign In

Comparison between two dentures i.e. one is made with a modified material(antimicrobial agent) and another with regular material to test the difference of fitting and microbial count between them.

Comparative evaluation of retention and Candidal count in patients wearing maxillary complete dentures fabricated using 1.5% Zirconium dioxide nanoparticle modified heat polymerized PMMA resin (double layered technique) and conventional heat polymerized PMMA resin: a randomised cross over clinical study

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2023/02/049431
Enrollment
24
Registered
2023-02-03
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-04-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K069- Disorder of gingiva and edentulousalveolar ridge, unspecified

Interventions

Intervention1: 1.5% Zirconium dioxide nanoparticle modified heat polymerized PMMA resin denture base: conventional denture base material used for fabrication of dentures is polymethyl methacrylate (PM

Sponsors

Dhruti Modi
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: a. Completely edentulous participants requiring removable complete dentures. b. Patients with Type A Maxillary residual ridge morphology and Class I Complete edentulism based on the American College of Prosthodontists (ACP) classification. c. Patients with maxillary edentulous ridges with no anterior and/or posterior undercuts.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: a. Patients with implants or overdenture abutments in upper arch. b. Absence of any local and systemic disease that produce oral manifestations. c. Patients with excessive gag reflex. d. Patients with reduced salivary flow or having xerostomia. e. Patients with known allergy to denture base material (PMMA). f. Patients having any surgical or congenital maxillary defects. g. Patients who are not willing to sign the consent form.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Retention testing of the denture Candidal count testing intraorallyTimepoint: Retention testing at baseline and 1 month Candidal count testing at baseline and 1 month—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
NILTimepoint: NIL—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDhruti kamlesh Modi

K M Shah dental college and Hospital

rajeshsethu77academics@gmail.com9725038434

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026