Comparison of incidence of pain in inguinal region after Laparoscopic and Open Inguinal Hernia Mesh surgery. A Prospective Cross-Sectional Study.

Comparison of incidence of Inguinodynia after Laparoscopic and Open Inguinal Hernia Mesh Repair. A Prospective Cross-Sectional Study.

Status

Recruiting

Phases

Phase 3

Study type

Observational

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2023/02/049385

Enrollment

Registered

2023-02-01

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2024-07-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: M00-M99- Diseases of the musculoskeletal system and connective tissue

Interventions

None listed

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Subject is willing and able to provide written informed consent. All cases clinically diagnosed to have inguinal hernia and who have undergone inguinal hernia repair during the period of study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Recurrent inguinal hernia Bilateral inguinal hernia (to avoid bias) Complicated inguinal hernia(obstructed/strangulated/incarcerated) Patients suffering from other pain syndromes and chronic disorders like spine traumas, diagnosed neuropathies, collagen vascular disease, chronic renal failure, bleeding disorders and immune compromised status pre-operatively Non complaint patients- Psychiatric patients

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
1) To grade pain on first follow up/ ! month post Op. 2) To calculate the incidence of inguinodynia at 3 months 3)To check if there is a relation betwenn operative time and inguinodynia 4)To check if inguinodynia is significantly lesser in laparoscopic hernia repaircompared to open hernia repair. This study may suggest that something in the currently employed methods of groin hernia repair is associated with an increase in the post operative pain and it may provide a hypothesis for further investigations.Timepoint: 1.5 years	—

Measure

Time frame

1) To grade pain on first follow up/ ! month post Op. 2) To calculate the incidence of inguinodynia at 3 months 3)To check if there is a relation betwenn operative time and inguinodynia 4)To check if inguinodynia is significantly lesser in laparoscopic hernia repaircompared to open hernia repair. This study may suggest that something in the currently employed methods of groin hernia repair is associated with an increase in the post operative pain and it may provide a hypothesis for further investigations.Timepoint: 1.5 years

—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
This study may suggest that something in the currently employed methods of groin hernia repair is associated with an increase in the post operative pain and it may provide a hypothesis for further investigationsTimepoint: 1.5 years	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactSanath Patil

KMC, Manipal

kallyarajgopalshenoy@gmail.com9845243460

Outcome results