Skip to content

A study that compares functioning of hand among adults with wrist instability who underwent surgery for wrist fracture

A comparative study of functional outcomes after immobilization versus immediate mobilization in operated adult distal radius fractures with acute distal radio ulnar joint instability by volar locking plate.

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2023/02/049377
Enrollment
84
Registered
2023-02-01
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2023-02-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: S525- Fracture of lower end of radius

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Kasturba medical college MAHE MANIPAL
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1.Adults (both genders) above 18 years of age 2.Unilateral intra-articular or extra-articular distal radius fracture (considered a fracture at or distal to the junction of the metaphysis and diaphysis) that requires open reduction and internal fixation with volar locking plate with demonstratable DRUJ instability using intraoperative fluoroscopy and intra-operative clinical assessment. 3.Distal radius fractures associated with or without ulnar styloid fractures.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. An open injury or a fracture with neurovascular injury. 2. Previous injury to the injured or contralateral shoulder, elbow, forearm, wrist or hand. 3. Symptomatic wrist pain or instability in either limb prior to the fracture. 4. DRUJ instability treated with primary open/arthroscopic TFCC repair 5. DRUJ instability treated with Ulnar styloid fracture fixation

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Fixation and immobilization of acute DRUJ instability offers better stability initially and good functional outcomes in the future than immediate mobilization following fixation of acute distal radius fractures by volar locking plateTimepoint: Functional outcomes are compared among three treatments groups at 6 months and one year follow ups using students T test

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
No significant difference in functional outcomes among three treatment groups at 6 months and one year followupsTimepoint: No significant difference in functional outcomes among three treatment groups at 6 months and one year followups

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactVenkata Yuvaraj Matcha

Kasturba medical college, MAHE, Manipal

sandeep.vijayan@manipal.edu9449615291

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026