Skip to content

Comparing outcomes of electric blade and routine surgical blade made of stainless steel for making surgical cut on abdomen

A study comparing the results of diathermy versus scalpel for abdominal skin Incision

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2023/01/049212
Enrollment
174
Registered
2023-01-25
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2023-02-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical

Interventions

Intervention1: Nil: Nil Control Intervention1: Skin incision: The skin incision taken with diathermy and with stainless steel blade will be compared in respective of intra op skin blood loss, post ope

Sponsors

Dr Shafiuddin
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1.Patients undergoing elective and emergency surgery for whom abdominal incision is taken. 2. Patients on anticoagulants, known case of coagulopathies.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Scar at planned incision site. 2. Patients with pacemakers. 3. Patients with pre existing pain at incision site or any neuropathy. 4. Immuno compromised patients due to chemotherapy, immunosuppressantâ??s, corticosteroids etc. 5. Pregnancy.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
incision time and blood loss, Post operative Pain, Scar formationTimepoint: incision time taken and blood loss by pre operative and post operative weight of gauze Post operative Pain at Post Operative day 0 , 1 and day 2 and scar formation on day 4, day 10 and day 28.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Post operative wound infection. Post operative complications. Scar character. Timepoint: 28 days/ 4 weeks /1 month

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactH M ABHIJITH

RGUHS

drmohdshafi@hotmail.com8105954163

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026