Skip to content

Comparative evaluation of two different types of aesthetic crowns in pediatric patients - An in vivo study

"Comparative Evaluation of Clinical Success of Zirconia Crowns and Esthetic Flexible Crowns in Primary Teeth – A Parallel Group Prospective Randomized Clinical Study"

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2023/01/048916
Enrollment
60
Registered
2023-01-11
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-05-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K029- Dental caries, unspecified

Interventions

Intervention1: zirconia crown: tooth will be prepared as per manufacturer instructions. intervention duration is 12 months Control Intervention1: bioflex crown: tooth will be prepared as per the manuf

Sponsors

Amol Patil
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Parents willing to give consent. Primary teeth indicated for full coverage restoration. Frankel’s positive and definitely positive patients Children aged between 4 to 10 years. No significant medical history. Patients willing to return for follow-up examinations and evaluation. No active periodontal diseases. Primary teeth indicated for full coverage restoration. Each selected tooth must have an antagonist tooth present

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Any subject that does not fall under the inclusion criteria were excluded Parents not willing to give consent. Children below the age of 4 and above the age of 10. Children with special needs. Inadequate root length. Child allergic to local anesthesia, chromium, or nickel Severely decayed tooth prohibiting the retention and the sealing of the restoration Tooth with evidence of swelling in the surrounding tissues Tooth in infra-occlusion Presence of malocclusion like cross bite, crowding, scissor bite etc.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The primary outcome is the success of the treatment. Success will be defined by the absence of major failure fracture, wear, color change Duration, occlusion, gingival margin extension and parent acceptance will be clinically evaluated at baseline and at last appointment Timepoint: 12 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
The secondary outcomes are parental and child satisfaction (size, form, and function), retention and fracture of the crown. The wear of the antagonist tooth will be recorded. gingival condition, the wear of the antagonist teeth, as well as both parental and child satisfaction.Timepoint: 12 months

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Amol Patil

Reader

amolpatil2526@gmail.com9561042279

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026