Skip to content

A device handling study comparing two dry powder inhalers in Asthma and COPD.

A Randomized, open-label, crossover, multicenter device usability study of Ciphaler™ versus Rotahaler® in patients with Asthma or Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD).

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2023/01/048837
Enrollment
75
Registered
2023-01-09
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-01-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: J449- Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, unspecified Health Condition 2: J459- Other and unspecified asthma

Interventions

Intervention1: Placebo Ciphaler™: Inhaled route Control Intervention1: Rotahaler® with Placebo Rotacaps: Inhaled Route

Sponsors

Cipla Ltd
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Voluntarily given signed dated Informed consent from subjects. 2. Subjects of 18 years and above with history of asthma or COPD for more than 6 months prior to screening. 3. Subjects with asthma or COPD who are device naïve or those using BAI, pMDI or pMDI + spacer. 4. Subjects naïve to Ciphaler™ and Rotahaler® use. 5. Subjects naïve to any other DPIs for 6 months prior to screening. 6. Subjects able to read PIL.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Subjects who are hypersensitive to placebo or its constituents. 2. Subjects with any condition that affected the subject’s ability to operate the inhaler such as cognitive or musculoskeletal or neurological conditions (myopathy or neuropathy causing muscle weakness of the upper limbs, tracheostomy and impaired mental status, rheumatism, eye disorder, dementia, and finger disorder or injury). 3. Subjects ineligible to use a DPI in Investigator’s opinion.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Time taken to use the device correctly Proportion of subjects who made errors after reading the PIL Proportion of subjects who made errors after training Average number of errors made by the patient Total number of training sessions Number of attempts Assessment of self-completed device usability questionnaire (Part A and B)Timepoint: Single Visit

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
NATimepoint: NA

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactMr Abhijit Vaidya

Cipla Limited

sandesh.sawant3@cipla.com022-23082891

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026