Skip to content

COMPARISON BETWEEN AN ALKASITE MATERIAL (CENTION-N) AND STAINLESS STEEL CROWNS AS RESTORATIVE MATERIALS FORPULPOTOMISED PRIMARY MOLARS: A RANDOMIZED CLINICAL STUDY

Alkasite Versus Stainless Steel Crown As A Restorative Material In Pulpotomised Primary Molars : A Randomized Study

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2023/01/048831
Enrollment
60
Registered
2023-01-09
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2023-02-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K040- Pulpitis

Interventions

Intervention1: Alkasite restoration: Post Pulpotomy Restoration in Primary Molars, Duration of 12 months Control Intervention1: Stainless Steel Crown: Dental Crowns over Pulpotomised Primary Molars. D

Sponsors

Kanwalpreet Kaur
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Clinically, an asymptomatic primary molar with an occluso proximal carious lesion involving the marginalridge (more than half the marginal ridge, studied by measuring the inter cuspal distance- bucco lingual)involved in the carious process. (Duggal MS & Nooh A 2002)The involved teeth should be having no signs of pathologic mobility, no swelling or fistula, no history ofspontaneous and nocturnal pain, and tenderness to percussion or palpation.2. Radiographically, a deep carious lesion approaching the pulp with no evidence of periapical pathology likeabscess, periodontal space widening, periapical or furcation radiolucency, or internal or external resorption. 3. Teeth having no more than one third of their roots undergoing physiologic resorption as evaluated byIOPAR

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Children with any kind of systemic disease (developmental anomalies and compromised immunity)2. Children with non acceptable oral hygeine with a plaque index score of as high as three (abundance of softdeposits within the gingival pocket and/or on the gingival margin and adjacent tooth surface).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The clinical evaluation of the two restorations will be assessed using parameters of marginal integrity, proximal contact, gingival health, secondary caries and discomfort on biting, as per the modified USPHS- United States Public Health Service criteria , and the clinical and the radiographic success of the pulpotomised molarsTimepoint: 6, 9 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
The clinical success of the two materials in comparison to each other as well as the clinical and radiographic success of the studied teeth.Timepoint: 12 months

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Kanwalpreet Kaur

Baba Jaswant Singh Dental College Hospital and Research Institute

bsuneja61@yahoo.com

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026