Skip to content

A clinical study to Compare the Safety and Effectiveness of Digifine Capsule and Pantoprazole plus Domperidone or Pantoprazole versus Pantoprazole plus Domperidone and Pantoprazole in Patients with Functional dyspepsia

A Prospective, Randomized, Open-label, Parallel-group, Investigator-initiated Study to Evaluate and Compare the Safety and Effectiveness of Digifine Capsule coadministered with FDC of Pantoprazole plus Domperidone or Pantoprazole versus FDC of Pantoprazole plus Domperidone and Pantoprazole in Management of Patients with Functional dyspepsia.

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2022/12/048631
Enrollment
80
Registered
2022-12-30
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2023-01-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K929- Disease of digestive system, unspecified

Interventions

Intervention1: Digifine 40 mg Capsules: 1 capsule three times daily before food for 30 days Control Intervention1: Pantoprazole Tablet, 40 mg: 1 tablet three times daily before food for 30 days Contro

Sponsors

Dr Ranjana G Deshmukh
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Adult male or female patients between 18 to 60 years (both ages inclusive) 2. Patients with functional dyspepsia as per ROME IV criteria and currently not receiving any treatment since at least two weeks prior to screening (ROME IV criteria can be referred) 3. Patients had an upper endoscopy performed within 3 months before screening that showed no evidence of structural disease that was likely to explain the dyspepsia symptoms. 4. Patients willing to give their written informed consent to participate in the study and able to record answers on study-related questionnaires 5. Patients willing to comply with all aspects of the protocol

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Patients hypersensitive to active or inactive ingredients of investigational products 2. Patient with history of taking medicines responsible for QT prolongation 3. Patients with history of cardiac disorder (clinically significant bradycardia, sinus node dysfunction, prolonged QTc, cardiac conduction intervals, history of arrhythmia or at risk of serious ventricular arrhythmias) 4. Patients with history of clinically significant hepatic dysfunction, renal insufficiency, electrolyte disorders, which in the opinion of the investigator might affect patientâ??s safety while participating in the study or affect study treatment result analysis 5. Patients with history of gastrointestinal hemorrhage or obstruction or having any symptoms suggestive of gastrointestinal hemorrhage or obstruction or prolactinoma 6. Patients who have history significant electrolyte disturbances or underlying cardiac diseases such as congestive heart failure, hepatic diseases or renal disease as per investigatorâ??s judgment may impact the efficacy analyses for the study or put the Patientâ??s safety at risk based on prescribing information of pantoprazole and/or domperidone 7. Female patients who are pregnant, lactating, or planning to become pregnant 8. Patients (male and female both) not willing to use acceptable method of contraception 9. Patients scheduled to undergo surgery during the study period 10. Patients who have received any intervention in a clinical trial within 01 month prior to screening 11. Patients with history of alcohol or substance abuse which as per Investigator"s which may interfere with safety of patients or treatment evaluation while participating in the study 12. Current significant alcohol consumption or smoking tobacco based on investigator"s evaluation of patient"s lifestyle which may interfere with safety of patients or treatment evaluation while participating in the study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
1. Percentage change in global overall symptom scale on Visit 2/Day 15 (±4days) days of treatment from baseline as assessed by severity of dyspepsia symptoms (Group A vs. Group C and D; Group B vs. Group C and D; and Group A versus Group B) 2. Percentage change in global overall symptom scale on Visit 3/Day 31 (±4days) of treatment from baseline and from Day 14 as assessed by severity of dyspepsia symptoms (Group A vs. Group C and D; Group B vs. Group C and D; and Group A versus Group B)Timepoint: 1. Visit 2/Day 15 (±4days) days of treatment from baseline 2. Visit 3/Day 31 (±4days) of treatment from baseline and from Day 14

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Proportion of patients with adequate relief on Visit 2 and Visit 3 from baseline as assessed by total symptom score recorded under functional dyspepsia diary questions Adequate relief defined as more than 50 percent reduction in the total symptom score based on functional dyspepsia symptom diaryTimepoint: Visit 2 and Visit 3 from baseline;Proportion of patients with decrease in severity of each symptom score assessed from functional dyspepsia symptom diary on Day 3 and Day 6 and Day 9 and Day 12 and Day 18 and Day 21 and Day 24 from baselineTimepoint: Day 3 and Day 6 and Day 9 and Day 12 and Day 18 and Day 21 and Day 24;Proportion of patients with adequate relief on Day 7 and Day 21 period from baselineTimepoint: Day 7 and Day 21 period from baseline

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Ranjana G Deshmukh

Dr. Hedgewar Rugnalaya

drranjana.dhr@gmail.com02402245000

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026