Skip to content

clinical evaluation of 2 different types of crowns when placed with different techniques of crown placement

Comparative evaluation of clinical and radiographic success after placement of preformed stainless steel and flexible esthetic crowns by various techniques in pediatric patients – A parallel group prospective randomized clinical study.

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2022/12/048617
Enrollment
60
Registered
2022-12-30
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-05-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K029- Dental caries, unspecified

Interventions

Intervention1: Conventional technique of tooth preparation: Bioflex and stainless steel Crowns will be placed with conventional techniques of tooth preparation duration is 12 months Control Interventi

Sponsors

Dr Amol Patil
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients and parents of the patients who accept to participate and sign the informed consent Primary teeth indicated for full coverage restoration. Frankel’s positive and definitely positive patients Children aged between 4 to 10 years. No significant medical history. Patients willing to return for follow-up examinations and evaluation. No active periodontal diseases.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients and parents of the patients who do not accept to participate and sign the informed consent Patients with a systemic disease, Teeth which have a short period of time for succedaneous teeth to erupt Any subject that does not fall under the inclusion criteria were excluded Children with special needs. Presence of malocclusion like cross bite, crowding, scissor bite etc. Lived in remote villages and were unlikely to return for follow-up Patients with TMJ abnormalities.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The primary outcome is the success of the treatment. Success will be defined by the absence of major failure fracture, wear, color change Duration, occlusion, gingival margin extension and parent acceptance will be clinically evaluated at baseline and at last appointment Timepoint: 12 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
The secondary outcomes are parental and child satisfaction (size, form, and function), retention and fracture of the crown. . Finally, the wear of the antagonist tooth will be recorded (0: absence of wear; 1: wear on only the cusp point; and 2: wear at least at the cusps) reference. To prevent information bias, the evaluators will not be the operators who applied the treatment. Timepoint: 12 months

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Amol Patil

M A Rangoonwala College of Dental Sciences and Research Institute Pune

amolpatil2526@gmail.com

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026