Skip to content

â??EFFECT OF BAREFOOT VS ARCH SUPPORT WALKING ON BALANCE AND FUNCTIONAL STATUS AMONG YOUNG COLLAGE GOING STUDENTS WITH PRONATED FEET: A RANDOMIZED CONTROL TRIALâ??

â??EFFECT OF BAREFOOT VS ARCH SUPPORT WALKING ON BALANCE AND FUNCTIONAL STATUS AMONG YOUNG COLLEGIATE STUDENTS WITH PRONATED FEET: A RANDOMIZED CONTROL TRIALâ??

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2022/12/048352
Enrollment
60
Registered
2022-12-21
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2023-01-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Intervention1: Group A will be receiving conventional exercise ( Short foot exercise 5 second holds 2. Heel cord stretch 30 sec hold 3. Toe spread 5 second hold 4. Towel curling 5. Picking up smal

Sponsors

Kajal Joshi, PT
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1.Subjects diagnosed with pronated feet with flat feet (unilateral / bilateral ) 2.Age group 18 to 26 years 3.Navicular drop test >10mm 4.Both male and female

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1.Recent surgery 2.Uncooperative subject 3.Subjects with previous history of foot , ankle surgery or fracture 4.Any systemic disorder like Diabetic neuropathy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
1.Navicular drop test Timepoint: After 4 weeks

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1.Pedalo sensamove sensebalance miniboard 2.Foot Functional Index.Timepoint: After 4 Weeks

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactKajal Joshi PT

School of Physiotherapy, RK University

amit.sharma@rku.ac.in9811281520

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026