COMPARISON BETWEEN TWO MODIFICATIONS OF VIDEO ASSISTED DEVICE USED FOR GENERAL ANESTHESIA

COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF CHANNELED VS NON-CHANNELED BLADE OF KING VISION VIDEO LARYNGOSCOPE IN GENERAL SURGICAL PROCEDURES - KVCNC

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 2Phase 3

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2022/12/048255

Enrollment

Registered

2022-12-19

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2023-01-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical

Interventions

Intervention1: ENDOTRACHEAL INTUBATION USING KING VISION CHANNELED LARYNGOSCOPE: ENDOTRACHEAL INTUBATION FOR GENERAL ELECTIVE SURGERIES USING KING VISION CHANNELED VIDEO LARYNGOSCOPE TIME RECORDED FOR

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Ageâ??18 to 60yrs. 2. Gender (s) â?? both 3. ASA Grade I and II 4. Modified Mallampati classification grade I or II

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Patients with Modified Mallampati grade III and IV 2. Patient refusal 3. History of severe bradycardia 4. Any type of A-V block in E.C.G 5. Heart failure 6. Liver cirrhosis 7. Thrombocytopenia 8. Coagulopathy 9. History of hypertension 10. Patients age 60 yrs. 11. Emergency surgery 12. Allergy to any drug 13. Inability to communicate effectively 14. Deformity of face 15. Buck teeth 16. Receeding teeth 17. Any abnormality of temporomandibular joint 18. Restricted neck movement

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
1. Time for visualisation of the glottis â?? including time for introduction of laryngoscope until view of glottis. 2. Intubation time- Time taken from insertion of Kingvision videolaryngoscope till passage of endotracheal tube in the glottis. 3. Success rate â?? Number of patients intubated successfully.Timepoint: TIME TAKEN FOR VISUALISATION OF GLOTTIS AND TOTAL DURATION OF INTUBATION AFTER INSERTION OF LARYNGOSCOPE IN MOUTH.	—

Measure

Time frame

1. Time for visualisation of the glottis â?? including time for introduction of laryngoscope until view of glottis. 2. Intubation time- Time taken from insertion of Kingvision videolaryngoscope till passage of endotracheal tube in the glottis. 3. Success rate â?? Number of patients intubated successfully.Timepoint: TIME TAKEN FOR VISUALISATION OF GLOTTIS AND TOTAL DURATION OF INTUBATION AFTER INSERTION OF LARYNGOSCOPE IN MOUTH.

—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
1. Number of attempts. 2. Ease of laryngoscope insertion. 3. Quality of visualisation of glottis (C-L grading). 4. Assisted maneuvres. 5. Haemodynamic changes â?? systolic BP, Diastolic BP, Heart Rate, Spo2, Etco2. 6. Any injury to the airway.Timepoint: HEMODYNAMIC PARAMETERS RECORDED AT BASELINE, 1 MIN, 3 MIN, 5 MIN, 10 MIN, 15 MIN, 20 MIN AND THEN AT 10 MIN INTERVAL TILL 2 HOURS	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDR HARMANJOT KAUR

GOVERNMENT MEDICAL COLLEGE, AMRITSAR

rajan.verma0102@gmail.com9815267049

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026