Skip to content

COMPARISON BETWEEN TWO VIDEO ASSISTED DEVICES USED FOR GIVING GENERAL ANESTHESIA

COMPARISON BETWEEN KING VISION CHANNELED vs. C-MAC D-BLADE VIDEO LARYNGOSCOPE FOR EASE OF INTUBATION - A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED STUDY - KVC

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 2Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2022/12/048253
Enrollment
80
Registered
2022-12-19
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2023-01-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical

Interventions

Intervention1: ENDOTRACHEAL INTUBATION USING C-MAC VL: ENDOTRACHEAL INTUBATION DONE FOR GENERAL ELECTIVE SURGERIES USING C-MAC VIDEO LARYNGOSCOPE THEN TIME RECORDED FOR VARIOUS PARAMETERS LIKE VISUALI

Sponsors

GOVERNMENT MEDICAL COLLEGE AMRITSAR
Lead Sponsor
DR RAJAN KUMAR
Collaborator

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Age â?? 18 to 60 years 2. Gender â?? Both Male and Female 3. ASA Grade I and II 4. Mallampati Classification Grade I and II

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Mallampati Grading Grade III and IV 2. Any Facial Abnormality 3. Receding teeth, Buck teeth 4. Mouth opening less than 2 fingers 5. Inability to Communicate Effectively 6. Patient Refusal 7. Congestive Cardiac Failure(CCF) 8. Severe Bradycardia 9. Heart Block 10.Blood Dyscrasia or Coagulopathy 11.Thrombocytopenia 12.Emergency Surgery 13.Age 60 years 14.Hypertension History

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
1. Time for visualization of the glottis â?? It includes time for introduction of laryngoscope until the view of glottis. 2. Intubation time- Time taken from insertion of C-MAC Video laryngoscope or King Vision laryngoscope till the passage of endotracheal tube in the glottis. 3. Success rate- Number of patients intubated successfully.Timepoint: Time taken for visualisation of glottis and total intubation time will be recorded starting from introduction of laryngoscope in the mouth.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. Number of attempts 2. Ease of laryngoscope insertion 3. Quality of visualization 4. Assisted maneuvers 5. Hemodynamic changes â?? Systolic BP, Diastolic BP, Heart rate, SpO2, EtCO2 6. Any injury to the airwayTimepoint: Hemodyamic parameters will be recorded starting from baseline,1 min,3 min,5 min,10 min,15 min,20 min and then at 10 min interval till end of suyrgery

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDR RISHABH KHURANA

GOVERNMENT MEDICAL COLLEGE, AMRITSAR

drveenachatrath@yahoo.com9814112355

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026