Skip to content

A clinical trial to compare the effect of a bone regenerating material in two different ratios in the treatment of bone loss in permanent teeth.

Comparative evaluation of efficacy of biphasic calcium phosphate bone graft in two different ratios in the treatment of Grade II molar furcation involvement - A 24 weeks clinical and radiological study.

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2022/12/048196
Enrollment
30
Registered
2022-12-16
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2023-01-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K051- Chronic gingivitis

Interventions

Intervention1: Biphasic calcium phosphate bone graft (70% HA & 30% β -TCP): 2- 5 grams of biphasic calcium phosphate bone graft (70% HA & 30% β -TCP) placed in the furcation involvement only once du

Sponsors

Dr Anshika Sharma
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients with good systemic and mental health with no systemic diseases that could influence the outcome of the therapy. Patients having Glickmanâ??s Grade II Molar Furcation involvement with horizontal probing depth of more than or equal to 3mm and vertical probing depth of more than or equal to 4mm. Patients who are maintaining oral hygiene, after the re-evaluation of phase I therapy with Plaque index (PI) score less than 1. Patients who have not undergone any surgical periodontal therapy in last 6 months. Patients who had no known history of allergy to any of the materials used. Patients who are ready to sign informed consent and will be able to follow written or verbal instructions.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Debilitating systemic or infectious diseases (HIV or hepatitis) or any diseases that affect the periodontium. Poor compliance or failure to maintain good oral hygiene. Use of tobacco products either in smoking or smokeless forms. Patients taking immunosuppressive drugs or corticosteroids which may compromise the treatment outcome. History of a previous root coverage procedure, graft or GTR involving the recession site. A known allergy to any of the materials used in the study. Pregnancy or lactation.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Improvements in clinical parametersTimepoint: 12 weeks and 24 weeks

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Bone fillTimepoint: 24 weeks

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Vikram Blaggana

Inderprastha Dental College and Hospital

dr.pragya.trip@gmail.com9999977571

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026