Study of different types of upper airway devices for short surgical procedures.

A Comparative Study of Supraglottic Airway Devices I-Gel LMA, Proseal LMA and Blockbuster LMA in Adult Patients Undergoing Short Surgical Procedures Under General Anaesthesia.

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 4

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2022/12/047975

Enrollment

120

Registered

2022-12-08

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2023-01-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: J95- Intraoperative and postproceduralcomplications and disorders of respiratory system, not elsewhere classified

Interventions

Intervention1: Comparative study between I-Gel LMA, Proseal LMA and Blockbuster LMA for short surgical procedures: In my study, Im comparing three supraglottic airway devices, i-gel LMA, proseal LMA,

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: ASA I and II Procedure time- 30 to 120 mins undergoing elective surgical procedures under general Anaesthesia

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: ASA III and IV Difficult Airway, Mallampati III and IV Decreased lung compliance Bleeding/Coagulation disorder Patient refusal

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
To compare the number of attempts, time of insertion, between I-Gel LMA, proseal LMA, and blockbuster LMA in adults undergoing short surgical procedures.Timepoint: 2 hours intra-operatively	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Hemodynamic changes, Ease of insertion, Gastrictube insertion time, Adequacy of ventilation, and complications between I-Gel LMA, proseal LMA, and a blockbuster LMATimepoint: 2 hours intra-opeartively	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactArvind Kumar

IGIMS

arvind007kumar@yahoo.com8544413240

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026