Skip to content

A comparative study between Spasm relieving medications, Clonazepam and Baclofen given orally in spinal cord injury patients.

A comparative study of the therapeutic efficacy of oral clonazepam and oral baclofen on spasms among patients with spinal cord injury: A randomised controlled trial.

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 3Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2022/12/047966
Enrollment
30
Registered
2022-12-08
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2023-09-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: S140- Concussion and edema of cervical spinal cord Health Condition 2: S340- Concussion and edema of lumbar andsacral spinal cord Health Condition 3: S240- Concussion and edema of thoracic spinal cord Health Condition 4: S141- Other and unspecified injuries ofcervical spinal cord Health Condition 5: S241- Other and unspecified injuries ofthoracic spinal cord Health Condition 6: S341- Other and unspecified injury of lumbar and sacral spinal cord

Interventions

Intervention1: Clonazepam: Oral Clonazepam (0.25 mg to 1.5 mg per day in up to two divided doses) for a duration of thirty days Control Intervention1: Baclofen: Oral Baclofen (5 mg to 75 mg in up to 3

Sponsors

Bharat Pulavarti
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Spinal cord injury patients in the above age group, suffering from spasms, have sufficient mental capacity to respond relevantly to all queries related to spasms.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Spinal cord injury patients who exhibit spasticity but do not present with spasms. Patients who are pregnant. Patients with narrow angle glaucoma. Patients with history of clinical depression and suicidal tendencies. Patients who are currently on antispastic and anti-spasm medication will not be enrolled in the study. Patients with deranged complete blood count, liver function tests and renal function tests. Patients with pre-existing musculoskeletal disorders and movement disorders in which spasms and spasticity cannot be assessed accurately.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Reduction in problematic spasms assessed by Penn spasm frequency and severity scale by at least one grade.Timepoint: The final assessment will be done on the 31st day after the initiation of the intervention

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
To determine the proportion of patients who benefitted from each intervention.Timepoint: Final assessment on 31st day after initiation of the intervention.

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactBharat Pulavarti

All India Institute of Physical Medicine and rehabilitation

dranilgaur@gmail.com

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026