patient satisfaction and activities patient can perform following Total Hip Replacement via two different surgical approaches 1)direct anterior and 2) posterior

Clinicoradiological outcomes and patient satisfaction following total hip arthroplasty via direct anterior approach vs posterior approach (a prospective randomized controlled trial)

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 2

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2022/11/047482

Enrollment

Registered

2022-11-21

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2025-02-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: M163- Unilateral osteoarthritis resulting from hip dysplasia Health Condition 2: M165- Unilateral post-traumatic osteoarthritis of hip Health Condition 3: M167- Other unilateral secondary osteoarthritis of hip Health Condition 4: M870- Idiopathic aseptic necrosis of bone Health Condition 5: M871- Osteonecrosis due to drugs Health Condition 6: M161- Unilateral primary osteoarthritisof hip Health Condition 7: M00-M99- Diseases of the musculoskeletal system and connective tissue

Interventions

Intervention1: Direct Anterior Approach: Total Hip Arthroplasty via Direct Anterior Approach to chech functional outcomes, clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction for 1 year Control Intervention1:

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: All patients with osteoarthritis, osteonecrosis, or dysplasia of hip with end stage arthritis warranting primary total hip arthroplasty in unilateral hip American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) grade 1 or 2

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients who had previously undergone any kind of surgery in affected hip Patients undergoing revision Total Hip arthroplasty Patients with a proximal femoral deformity Patient having an active infection Patient having severe contralateral hip disease Patient having neuromuscular pathology Patient with severe bone defect or requiring structural bone grafts.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
1 radiological outcome: Compare radiological outcome by taking x-ray 2 Clinical outcome: Compare overall clinical outcomes between two group using Harris Hip Score and WOMAC score 3 Functional outcome: Compare the satisfactory outcome between the two groups using SF-36 score modified Forgotten Joint Score Timepoint: At 6 weeks, 6 months, 1 year	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
1 To compare peri-operative parameters like Drop of Hemoglobin, intra/immediate post-operative complication, duration of surgery 2 To compare the length of hospital stay after undergoing Total Hip Arthroplasty via two different approaches 3 To compare the 90-days complication rates following Total Hip Arthroplasty via two different approaches 4 To compare the patient satisfaction following Total Hip Arthroplasty via two different approaches Timepoint: intra-operative, immediate post-operative	—

Measure

Time frame

1 To compare peri-operative parameters like Drop of Hemoglobin, intra/immediate post-operative complication, duration of surgery 2 To compare the length of hospital stay after undergoing Total Hip Arthroplasty via two different approaches 3 To compare the 90-days complication rates following Total Hip Arthroplasty via two different approaches 4 To compare the patient satisfaction following Total Hip Arthroplasty via two different approaches Timepoint: intra-operative, immediate post-operative

—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Krishna Kiran Eachempati

Medicover Hospital

kke1975@gmail.com9989049988

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026