FindTrial
Sign In

Periotome in atraumatic extraction

COMPARISON OF FLEXIBLE AND NON-FLEXIBLE CONVENTIONAL PERIOTOMES IN ATRAUMATIC EXTRACTIONS . A RANDOMISED CONTROLLED TRIAL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2022/11/047475
Enrollment
52
Registered
2022-11-21
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2023-01-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K00-K14- Diseases of oral cavity and salivary glands

Interventions

Intervention1: Instrument - Flexible peritome: flexible peritome GDC - type PFT1 use to severe the periodontal ligament while extractinng tooth it has wider blades and shape mmemory compared to orig

Sponsors

YENEPOYA UNIVERSITY
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Bilateral teeth needing atraumatic extractions for orthodontics or implant placement

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Pregnancy, systemic diasease , drug allergy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
TIME TAKEN FOR EXTRACTIONSTimepoint: 1 DAY—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
HEALING OF EXTRACTION SOCKETTimepoint: 7TH DAY—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactZoya rafiq

Yenepoya university

DRVINNYKOLARI@GMAIL.COM

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026