FindTrial
Sign In

Comparison between Traditional and vaginoscopic hysteroscopy In terms of pain, time taken and success of procedure.

Comparative analysis between traditional and vaginoscopic approach in patients undergoing diagnostic hysteroscopy

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2022/11/047432
Enrollment
100
Registered
2022-11-18
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2022-11-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: Z038- Encounter for observation for other suspected diseases and conditions ruled out

Interventions

Control Intervention1: Nil: Nil Control Intervention2: traditional hysteroscopy and vaginoscopic hysteroscopy: comparing two methods in terms of pain and time taken to complete the procedure

Sponsors

ABVIMS and Dr RML HOSPITAL
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: women under reproductive age group between 20 to 50 years who are planned for diagnostic hysteroscopy

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Pregnancy Acute genital tract infections Known history of cervical or uterine malignancy Uterine anomalies Post menopausal women Blood dyscrasias and coagulopathy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
pain comparision between vaginoscopic hysteroscopy and traditional hysteroscopy by wing baker faces pain scale at different stages of procedureTimepoint: Baseline—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Time taken and success of procedureTimepoint: Baseline—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Sangeeta Kumari

ABVIMS and Dr RML hospital

kamnadatta29@gmail.com9891145329

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026