Gum surgery to treat bone defect

COMPARISON OF SOFT TISSUE PARAMETERS BETWEEN ENTIRE PAPILLA PRESERVATION AND NON-INCISED PAPILLA SURGICAL APPROACH IN PERIODONTAL RECONSTRUCTION OF INTRABONY DEFECTS- A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED STUDY.

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 2

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2022/11/047400

Enrollment

Registered

2022-11-17

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2022-11-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K053- Chronic periodontitis

Interventions

Intervention1: Micro Surgery: ENTIRE PAPILLA PRESERVATION, Control Intervention1: Micro surgery: NON-INCISED PAPILLA SURGICAL APPROACH

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Periodontal Pocket Depth Greater than 5mm Intrabony defect involving buccal aspect

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1.Systemically compromised patients and those on medications that may interfere with wound healing. 2.Pregnant women and lactating mother. 3.Buccal defects in third molars. 4.Teeth with grade III mobility. 5.Teeth with incorrect endodontic treatment or restorative treatment.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Bleeding on probing,Gingival recession , Probing pocket depth, relative attachment level, keratinized width of gigiva, hight of papilla, wound healing.Timepoint: 12 weeks,24weeks	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Bleeding on probing,Gingival recession , Probing pocket depth, relative attachmentTimepoint: 12 weeks, 24 weeks	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr G Jagadish Reddy

Kamineni Institute Of Dental Sciences

drjagadishreddy@gmail.com9949801470

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026