FindTrial
Sign In

A study to compare accuracy and patient satisfaction after two different types of total knee replacement

A retrospective comparison of radiological and functional results of Accelerometer-based Navigated total knee replacement vs conventional total knee replacement

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2022/11/047268
Enrollment
100
Registered
2022-11-14
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2022-11-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

All India Institute of Medical Sciences NewDelhi
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Patient with primary or secondary osteoarthritis knee who have undergone primary total knee replacement by either conventional jigs or accelerometer-based navigation techniques

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
RADIOLOGICAL ALIGNMENT OF COMPONENTTimepoint: 2 weeks—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
KNEE SOCIETY FUNCTIONAL SCORETimepoint: 60 months—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactArun M

All India Institute of Medical Sciences, NewDelhi

rmalhotra62@gmail.com

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026