FindTrial
Sign In

Cost effectiveness and Functional outcomes Cardiac Rehabilitation

Cost Effectiveness and Functional Outcomes of Smartphone Cardiac Rehabilitation Assisted self-Management (SCRAM) versus Centre Based Cardiac Rehabilitation among patients with coronary heart disease in Southern India – A Multicentre Randomized Clinical Trial.

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2022/11/047143
Enrollment
100
Registered
2022-11-09
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-07-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: I00-I99- Diseases of the circulatory system

Interventions

Intervention1: Smart Phone Assisted and Centre Based Cardiac Rehabilitation: Smart Phone Cardiac Rehabiliation Assisted Self Management Cardiac Rehabiltation for 24 weeks, 5 sessions a week for interv

Sponsors

Premkumar Mariarathinam
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Smart Phone Assisted Cardiac Rehabilitation.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Complicated Cardiovascular Diseases Severe Neurological, Respiratory, Orthopaedic and Psychological disorders

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Cost Effeciveness Economic Cost for Performing Cardiac Rehabiltation Timepoint: 24 weeks, 36 weeks, 48 weeks, 72 weeks—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Six Minute Walk Test Distance in Meters Talk Test Value in Seconds SF 36 Questinairre values High Density Lipoproteins Level Random Blood Sugar LevelTimepoint: Baseline, 24 weeks, 36 weeks, 48 weeks, 72 weeks—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactPremkumar Mariarthinam

Institute of Physiotherapy, Srinivas University, Mangaluru, Karnataka.

80pk2009@gmail.com09442508754

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 5, 2026