Skip to content

Comparison of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery versus conventional approach in Gynecological surgeries: A Randomized control Trial.

Comparison of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery versus conventional approach in Gynecological surgeries: A Randomized control Trial.

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2022/11/047077
Enrollment
132
Registered
2022-11-07
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2022-11-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: - Health Condition 2: PCS- Health Condition 3: N709- Salpingitis and oophoritis, unspecified

Interventions

Control Intervention1: conventional method: conventional protocol is a pre operative, intra operative, post operative Protocol,it does not requires dose or route of administration.Duration is for 1 y

Sponsors

S Ilamathi
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: female patient with 20 -79 years who are posted for surgery are included in this study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1.Uncontrolled Diabetes (Glycated haemoglobin >8.5%) 2.coronary heart disease 3.BMI > 35kg/m2

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To compare the effect of ERAS protocol versus conventional protocol in patients undergoing gynecological surgeries on length of hospital stay (LOS), post operative complications, and readmission rates.Timepoint: 12 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
To assess the patients adherence to ERAS protocol.Timepoint: 12 months

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactS Ilamathi

Sri Manakula Vinayagar Medical college and hospital,Puducherry

ilamathi@live.in9791672954

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026