FindTrial
Sign In

Comparison of two laryngeal mask airways used for ventilating patients during operative procedures under general anesthesia.

A COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN LMA BLOCKBUSTER AND LMA PROSEAL IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING OPERATIVE PROCEDURES UNDER GENERAL ANAESTHESIA ââ?¬â?? A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMISED CONTROLLED STUDY.

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2022/10/046349
Enrollment
90
Registered
2022-10-11
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2022-10-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K801- Calculus of gallbladder with othercholecystitis Health Condition 2: M84- Disorder of continuity of bone Health Condition 3: C50- Malignant neoplasm of breast

Interventions

Intervention1: LMA Proseal size according to patients weight: Airway management in patients undergoing operative procedures under GA for upto 4 hours Control Intervention1: LMA Blockbuster size accord

Sponsors

DEPARTMENT OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY AND CRITICAL CARE JAWAHARLAL NEHRU MEDICAL COLLEGE AMU
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. ASA Grade I & II patients 2. Weight between 40-70 kg 3. All classes of MP Grades

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Any pathology of the oral cavity that may obstruct the insertion of device 2. Mouth opening less than 2.5cm. 3. Potentially full stomach patients (trauma, morbid obesity, history of gastric regurgitation and heart burn, full term pregnancy) 4. Risk of oesophageal reflux (hiatus hernia) 5. Bleeding disorder 6. Unable to provide informed consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Comparative evaluation of LMA Blockbuster and LMA ProSeal in terms of rapidity of insertion.Timepoint: in seconds—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. Comparison of grade of insertion. 2. Comparison of oropharyngeal leak pressure. 3. Comparison of position with fibreoptic laryngoscope 4. Comparison of hemodynamic changes. 5. Comparison of post-insertion complications.Timepoint: in seconds, POGO score—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactSYED MOIED AHMED

Dept of Anaesthesiology, JNMCH

syedmoiedahmed123@gmail.com9897454739

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026