FindTrial
Sign In

Connective tissue Graft taken from patients palate for the treatment of gum recession

Laser De-Epithelialized Gingival grafts versus subepithelial connective tissue graft in the treatment of multiple marginal tissue recession in the maxillary esthetic zone using modified coronally advanced flap technique-A comparative Randomised clinical study.

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2022/10/046251
Enrollment
30
Registered
2022-10-07
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-08-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K11- Diseases of salivary glands

Interventions

Intervention1: Modified Coronally Advanced Flap with Subepithelial Connective Tissue Graft: The coronally advanced flap will be prepared as described by Zucchelli & De Sanctis´ (2000).The donor site w

Sponsors

Government Dental College And Research institute Bangalore
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1.Presence of at least two adjacent teeth with [Cairo RT 1] buccal Marginal gingival recession defects =2 mm in depth, with height of keratinized gingiva apical to recession =2 mm. 2.Presence of identifiable buccal cemento-enamel junction (CEJ) without any carious lesion or restoration. 3.Generally healthy patients.[ASA 1,ASA II] 4.Palatal mucosal thickness =2.5mm as assessed by trans-gingival probing which serve as donor site. 5.Full mouth plaque score

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1.Pregnant and lactating women. 2.Recession defects associated with non-carious cervical lesions 3.Teeth with evidence of a pulpal pathology and non-vital tooth. 4.Teeth that had periodontal surgical procedure for root coverage in the last 2 years; 5.Subjects who are active smokers at the time of screening; 6.Diabetes mellitus

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Mean root coverage, Recession depth reductionTimepoint: 0 months & 6 months,—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1.Pain assessment at the donor site (Visual Analogue Scale ) 2.Number of analgesic pills consumed per day 3.Height of keratinized tissue width 4.Relative attachment level 5.Root Coverage Esthetic score Timepoint: 1. Time Frame: 7 days 2.Time Frame:1- 7 days 3.Time Frame: 0months-6months 4.Time Frame: 0-3-6 months 5.Time Frame: 0months-6months—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Sudeep DK

Government dental college and research institute

periosmitha@gmail.com26703176

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026