A clinical trial to Compare clinical and imaging evaluation in surgical extraction of third molar teeth using two different surgical techniques

Comparative clinical and radiological evaluation in surgical extraction of impacted mandibular 3rd molars using Piezosurgery and conventional rotary technique - A Randomized Control Trial

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 3Phase 4

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2022/10/046244

Enrollment

Registered

2022-10-07

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2022-10-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: M270- Developmental disorders of jaws

Interventions

Intervention1: Group -I (Control): Patients who were treated with rotary osteotomy technique for one year duration Intervention2: Group II (Test): Patients who were treated with piezoelectric osteotom

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Clinical and radiological diagnosis of all Horizontally impacted mandibular third molar (WinterÃ¢â?¬•s Sub-Classification). Both male and female patients aged between 18 and 35 years of age

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: All Mesioangular,Vertical and Distoangular impacted mandibular third molars (WinterÃ¢â?¬•s classification) Forceps extractions not requiring osteotomy Any pathological condition that may affect bone healing

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
To compare the clinical outcome based on Pain assesed on Visual Analog Scale (VAS),Maximum inter-incisal mouth opening in millimetres and duration of the procedure recorded in minutes in patients undergoing surgical extraction of mandibular third molars using Piezosurgery unit and conventional rotary instrumentsTimepoint: After 7 days	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
1. To compare the bone density using Cone Beam Computed Tomography in HOUSEFIELD UNITS formed in the extraction socket after surgical extraction of horizontally impacted mandibular 3rd molars using Piezoelectric unit and conventional rotary technique 2.To compare the complication rate in surgical extraction of horizontally impacted mandibular 3rd molars using Piezoelectric unit and conventional rotary techniqueTimepoint: After 12 months	—

Measure

Time frame

1. To compare the bone density using Cone Beam Computed Tomography in HOUSEFIELD UNITS formed in the extraction socket after surgical extraction of horizontally impacted mandibular 3rd molars using Piezoelectric unit and conventional rotary technique 2.To compare the complication rate in surgical extraction of horizontally impacted mandibular 3rd molars using Piezoelectric unit and conventional rotary techniqueTimepoint: After 12 months

—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactVASANTHANARAYANAN R

ARMED FORCES MEDICAL COLLEGE

indranilcdu@yahoo.co.in8412847089

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026