FindTrial
Sign In

comparison between two drills for implant stability and crestal bone levels

comparison of primary stability and crestal bone levels of implants placed with conventional drills and osseodensification drills in mandibular posterior region: a prospective clinical study

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2022/10/046137
Enrollment
36
Registered
2022-10-03
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2022-10-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Intervention1: comparison of implant stability and crestal bone loss of implants placed using conventional drills and osseodensification drills in the mandibular posterior region. prospective clinical

Sponsors

Deepika
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: unilateral or bilateral edentulous mandibular posterior tooth region

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: poor oral hygiene ASA.3,4 bone width of less than 5 mm and length less than 10mm

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
implant stabilityTimepoint: baseline, 1month and 3 months—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
crestal bone lossTimepoint: 12 months—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr K Deepika

Vishnu Dental College

satya@vdc.edu.in9492293809

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026