Comparision of two different approaches of ultrasound-guided insertion of catheter inside the artery of hand in adults by new anaesthesia doctors after model practice

Comparison of USG guided Short Axis-Dynamic Needle Tip Positioning (SA-DNTP) technique vs Long Axis In Plane (LAIP) technique for Radial Artery Cannulation in Adults performed by Novice Anaesthesia Residents after Structured Simulated Training

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 3Phase 4

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2022/09/046097

Enrollment

Registered

2022-09-30

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2022-10-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Intervention1: Ultrasound guided short axis dynamic needle tip positioning technique of radial artery cannulation: After identifying the artery in a short axis view, a 20 G BD arterial cannula will be

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: For Study Participants: Anaesthesia residents with 6-12 months of training For Patients undergoing surgery under general anaesthesia: 1. ASA I/II 2. 18-60 years 3. Surgery requiring arterial cannulation in elective surgery

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: For Study Participants: 1. Participant refusal 2. Residents who are already trained in radial artery cannulation 3. Residents who have done >5 radial artery cannulations For Patients: 1. Patient refusal 2. Abnormal modified AllenÃ¢â?¬•s test 3. Peripheral vascular disease 4. SBP 5. BMI >30 kg/cm2 6. Patients with arrhythmia, tachycardia 7. Patients with any other contraindication for radial arterial cannulation 8. Local infection at site of cannulation 9. Patients with coagulopathy 10. Emergency surgery

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
First attempt success rate of radial artery cannulationTimepoint: At the time of arterial cannulation	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
1. Overall success rate 2. Total number of attempts 3. Time for successful cannulation 4. Incidence of posterior wall puncture 5. Incidence of hematoma formation 6. Self-assessment of participantÃ¢â?¬â?¢s level of confidence after the course Timepoint: At the time of arterial cannulation	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactSiri P H

AIIMS, New Delhi

abhishek.nagarajappa@outlook.com8587970180

Outcome results