Skip to content

A study to compare the outcome of joint lavage with i-PRF injection in treatment of TMJ disease using conventional method and/or using 3D printed patient model.

Comparative study of the clinical outcome of arthrocentesis along with intra-articular i-PRF injection in the treatment of TMJ dysfunction using conventional method and/or CT guided 3D printed patient specific template.

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2022/09/045728
Enrollment
20
Registered
2022-09-21
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-06-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: M266- Temporomandibular joint disorders

Interventions

Intervention1: Arthocentesis using CT guided 3D printed patient specific template: 1. On first appointment, CT guide is used to place two needles and irrigation of joint with 300ml RL followed by intr

Sponsors

Punjab Government Dental College and Hospital
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1 Adult patients above 18 years of age. 2 Patient who did not respond to conservative treatment such as soft diet analgesics etc 3 Patient suffering from internal derangement of TMJ diagnosed with CT of Wilke’s stage 1, 2, 3 4 Patient with unilateral pain, clicking sound or limited mouth opening/closing.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1 Patients with any systemic or malignant disease. 2 Patients who had previous TMJ invasive surgeries such as arthrocentesis arthroscopy maxillofacial trauma disc perforation. 3 Patients with Wilkes stage 4 5 4 Patients refused or to give consent for follow up.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Following Parameters are used to evaluate between conventional arthrocentesis and ARTHROCENTESIS using CT guided 3D printed patient specific guide. 1 Operative period will be recorder with the timer commenced from the insertion of first needle to visualization of solution from second needle. 2 Intra operative complications such as bleeding from ear. 3 Post operative complications such as facial paralysis pain hematoma etc 4 Pain will be assessed with Wisconsin Brief Pain Questionnare (1983) 5 Maximal mouth opening recorded by measuring the distance between upper and lower incisors in midline in millimeter before the procedure and after consecutive follow ups Timepoint: Post operative assessments after the first intervention will be conducted at 3 days, 2 weeks followed by 1, 2, 3, 6 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
not applicableTimepoint: not applicable

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Nitin Verma

Baba Farid University of Health Sciences Faridkot

Nitinvermagdc@gmail.com09814164068

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026