Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical
Conditions
Interventions
Intervention1: ââ?¬Å?COMPARISON BETWEEN PROPOFOL 3MG/KG AND ETOMIDATE 0.3MG/KG AS AN INDUCTION AGENT TO EVALUATE HEMODYNAMIC RESPONSE TO LARYNGOSCOPY AND ENDOTRACHEAL INTUBATIONââ?¬?: "TWO INTRAVEN
Sponsors
CIVIL HOSPITALGOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: ASA 1,2,3 PATIENTS POSTED FOR GENERAL SURGERY FOR SURGERY UNDER GENERAL ANESTHESIA REQUIRING ENDOTRACHEAL INTUBATION
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: Refusal to give consent Age ASA grade IV - V Known allergies to anaesthetic drugs Patients hemodynamically or neurologically unstable Patient having neurological or psychiatric disorder
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| EVALUATION OF PROPOFOL VS ETOMIDATE AS AN INDUCTION AGENT TO HEMODYNAMIC RESPONSE TO LARYNGOSCOPY AND ENDOTRACHEAL INTUBATION.Timepoint: FROM THE TIME OF INDUCTION TO 30 MIN POST ENDOTRACHEAL INTUBATION | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| CHANGES IN INTRA-OPERATIVE HEMODYNAMIC CHANGES ANY COMPLICATIONS LIKE APNEA, MYOCLONUSTimepoint: FROM THE TIME OF INDUCTION TO 30 MIN POST ENDOTRACHEAL INTUBATION | — |
Countries
India
Contacts
Public ContactDR S J GOSWAMI
B.J. MEDICAL COLLEGE AND CIVIL HOSPITAL AHMEDABAD
Outcome results
None listed