Health Condition 1: K928- Other specified diseases of the digestive system
Conditions
Interventions
Intervention1: Laryngoscopy: Comparison of efficacy of C-MAC Video laryngoscope,VL3R video laryngoscope and Macintosh laryngoscope
Intervention2: Laryngoscopy with C-MAC video Laryngoscope: Comparison
Sponsors
Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College AMU Aligarh
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: ASA Grade I &II patients. Age between 20-70 years Weight between 40-70 kg� Patients of both sexes Patients planned for elective surgery MP Grades I and II
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: Previous history of multiple/ failed intubation. Predicted difficult laryngoscopy Any pathology of the oral cavity that may obstruct the insertion of device Mouth opening less than 2.5cm. Potentially full stomach patients (trauma, morbid obesity, pregnancy, history of gastric regurgitation and heartburn) and at risk of esophageal reflux (hiatus hernia).
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| To compare the number of attempts required for successful intubation. Timepoint: 2 years | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| To grade the ease of tracheal intubation using these devices. To compare the laryngoscopy and intubation time using the three intubating devices. To compare the number of adjustment maneuvers required for successful intubation each device. To look for any complications like trauma and sore throat during laryngoscopy and intubation. Timepoint: 2 years | — |
Countries
India
Contacts
Public ContactQazi Ehsan Ali
Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College
Outcome results
None listed