COMPARISON OF VL3R VIDEOLARYNGOSCOPE AND FIBEROPTIC BRONCHOSCOPE FOR INTUBATION IN ADULT PATIENTS

A COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF POST INTUBATION HEMODYNAMIC STRESS RESPONSE BETWEEN VL3R VIDEO LARYNGOSCOPE AND FLEXIBLE FIBEROPTIC BRONCHOSCOPE IN ADULT PATIENTS UNDERGOING GENERAL ANAESTHESIA-A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMISED STUDY

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 3

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2022/08/044604

Enrollment

Registered

2022-08-03

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2022-10-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical

Interventions

Intervention1: FLEXIBLE FIBEROPTIC BRONCHOSCOPE: BRONCHOSCOPE Intervention2: GROUP V: VL3R VIDEO LARYNGOSCOPE: From the time the device is introduced between the two incisors till it is confirmed by c

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. ASA Grade I & II patients 2. BMI 3. MP I & II 4. Planned for surgery under GA

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Predicted difficult airway 2. History of multiple/failed intubation 3. Any pathology of oral cavity that may obstruct the insertion of device 4. Mouth opening less than 2.5cm 5. Potentially full stomach patients (trauma, morbid obesity, pregnancy, history of gastric regurgitation and heart burn) 6. At risk of esophageal reflux

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
To compare the mean arterial blood pressure changes during intubation using the two devicesTimepoint: Ã¢â?¬Â¢ Pre-induction Ã¢â?¬Â¢ 1 min Post Intubation Ã¢â?¬Â¢ 3 mins Post Intubation Ã¢â?¬Â¢ 5 mins Post Intubation	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
1.To compare the changes in heart rate and rate pressure product during intubation 2.To compare the number of attempts required for successful intubation 3.To grade the ease of tracheal intubation using these devices 4.To compare the laryngoscopy and intubation time using the two intubating devices 5.To compare the number of adjustment manoeuvers required for successful intubation 6.To look for any complications like trauma and sore throat during laryngoscopy and intubation.Timepoint: 1. Pre-induction, 1 min Post Intubation, 3 mins Post Intubation, 5 mins Post Intubation 2. Number of attempts 3. Ease of intubation (1/2/failed) 4. Intubation time (in seconds) from time device is introduced between the two incisors till its confirmation by capnographic trace 5. adjustment manoeuvers (0/1/2)	—

Measure

Time frame

1.To compare the changes in heart rate and rate pressure product during intubation 2.To compare the number of attempts required for successful intubation 3.To grade the ease of tracheal intubation using these devices 4.To compare the laryngoscopy and intubation time using the two intubating devices 5.To compare the number of adjustment manoeuvers required for successful intubation 6.To look for any complications like trauma and sore throat during laryngoscopy and intubation.Timepoint: 1. Pre-induction, 1 min Post Intubation, 3 mins Post Intubation, 5 mins Post Intubation 2. Number of attempts 3. Ease of intubation (1/2/failed) 4. Intubation time (in seconds) from time device is introduced between the two incisors till its confirmation by capnographic trace 5. adjustment manoeuvers (0/1/2)

—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactQazi Ehsan Ali

Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Aligarh Muslim University

qaziehsanali@gmail.com7417701769

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026