Skip to content

Comparison of accuracy of photogrammetry with 3D scanning and routine impression method for extraoral defects using a computer software

ââ?¬Å?Evaluation of accuracy of photogrammetry with 3D scanning and conventional method for craniomaxillofacial defects using a software analysis.ââ?¬?- An In Vivo Study

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 2Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2022/08/044524
Enrollment
15
Registered
2022-08-01
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2022-10-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: R688- Other general symptoms and signs Health Condition 2: R688- Other general symptoms and signs

Interventions

Intervention1: Photogrammetry: Photogrammetry is the second method, which uses finite pictures taken from various perspectives to create 3D digital models. When compared to traditional data collection
after that, post-processing can be done by a professional using photogrammetry software and CAD/CAM tools. The photogrammetrically formed 3D model can then be used to create a mould, which can be comp

Sponsors

Institutional funding Sharad pawar dental college and hospital DMIMS
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: � Defect size not bigger than 9 x 12 cm (3.5 x 4.5 inches) � In the age group of 10 -70 years � Extra oral defects

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients who are not ready to participate in the study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
This study would help in predicting the best method for craniomaxillofacial impression procedures. The final prosthesis will can be evaluated for precision, fit, accuracy, functional affectivity, time involved in comparison with conventional, photogrammetry and 3D scanning technology. The low-cost setup of photogrammetric method gives advantage of minimum chair side time and less patient exposure which is very much advantageous Timepoint: 1 week

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Time involved in comparison with conventional, photogrammetry and 3D scanning technology.Timepoint: 1 day

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactArushi Beri

Sharad pawar dental college and hospital DMIMS sawangi meghe wardha

chinmayeead@gmail.com7741967568

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 10, 2026