Skip to content

Effect of micro bone perforation on upper canine retraction during orthodontic tooth movement

Effect of micro-osteoperforation on maxillary canine retraction using sliding mechanics -an invivo study.

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2022/07/044421
Enrollment
30
Registered
2022-07-28
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-05-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: M263- Anomalies of tooth position of fully erupted tooth or teeth Health Condition 2: K088- Other specified disorders of teethand supporting structures

Interventions

Intervention1: Micro- osteoperforation: Done using an IDO device having a tip dimension of 1.2mm×6mm on buccal and palatal bone site of extracted first premolar by split mouth technique. Three perfora

Sponsors

Dr Kavya M P
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1)Angle’s Class 1 malocclusion with bidental proclination and class II malocclusion requiring maximum anchorage retraction.2)Subjects require extraction of first premolars as part of orthodontic treatment.3)No systemic disease.4)No radiographic evidence of bone loss.5)No history of periodontal therapy.6)No current active periodontal disease or carious lesions.7)Subject with healthy gingiva, having probing depth less than 4mm in all teeth. 8)Subject with gingival index and plaque index less than or equal to 1 Minimal crowding( < 4mm).9)No habit of smoking.10)Good Oral hygiene.11)Adequate alveolar bone trough width.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1)Subject with age less than 15 years and greater than 35 years of age. 2)Subject who does not require therapeutic first premolar extraction. 3)Subject with poorly aligned, levelled arches. 4)Active periodontal disease or caries. 5)Gingival probing depth more than 4mm in teeth. 6)Poor oral hygiene. 7)Parafunctional habits. 8)Systemic disease or conditions or long-term use of medications 9)Subjects with habit of smoking. 10)Evidence of bone loss.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Effect on rate of orthodontic tooth movement with micro-osteoperforation and without micro-osteoperforationTimepoint: 0,2,4,6,8,10,12,14 and 16 weeks

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Effect on clinical probing depthTimepoint: 0,16 weeks;Effect on level of gingival marginTimepoint: 0,16 weeks.

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Tojan Chacko

Sree Anjaneya Institute Of Dental Sciences

tojanchacko@gmail.com9446441166

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026