FindTrial
Sign In

Comparison of two methods of injection for prevention of pain which occurs on giving propofol

COMPARISON OF PREVENTION OF PAIN OF PROPOFOL INJECTION WITH IV 2% LIGNOCAINE BY INTERMITTENT VENOUS OCCLUSION VS IV 2% LIGNOCAINE WITHOUT VENOUS OCCLUSION METHOD- AN OBSERVATIONAL STUDY

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2022/07/044346
Enrollment
24
Registered
2022-07-26
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2022-10-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical

Interventions

Intervention1: Intermittent venous occlusion: One group of patient will be given IV 2% lignocaine with intermittent venous occlusion. 60 mg of lignocaine (3 ml) will be taken and diluted with 1 ml of

Sponsors

Department of anaesthesia
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Asa1 and 2; patients undergoing general anaesthesia; patients with written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients not willing for intervention; asa3 or above; allergic to drugs; age 65 years

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To compare pain on propofol injection by verbal rating scoreTimepoint: 4 weeks—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
To assess the pressor response on laryngoscopyTimepoint: 4 weeks—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Sandip Baheti

Dr D Y Patil medical college

Sandipbaheti1@gmail.com9822014401

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026