FindTrial
Sign In

Use of Baska mask versus Ambu-aura gain in adult patients undergoing elective surgery under general anaesthesia : A comparative study.

A comparative study to assess the safety and efficacy of Baska mask versus Ambu-aura gain in adult patients undergoing elective surgery under general anaesthesia:A prospective randomized study.

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2022/07/044255
Enrollment
60
Registered
2022-07-22
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2022-08-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: C509- Malignant neoplasm of breast of unspecified site

Interventions

Intervention1: Baska mask: Control of airway using Baska mask in adult patients subjected to general anaesthesia. Control Intervention1: Ambu -aura gain: Control of airway using ambu-aura gain in adul

Sponsors

Dr Shalini A
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1.Age group 18 â?? 60 years 2.ASA I and II 3.Patient who give valid informed written consent 4.Mallampati class 1 and 2 5.Patient undergoing elective surgeries under general anaesthesia with controlled ventilation 6.Duration of surgery

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1.Age 60 years 2.ASA grade III and above 3.Mallampati class 3 and above 4.Patients with systemic cardiovascular, respiratory, hepatic, renal or neurologic disorders 5.Emergency surgeries 6.Patients with decreased mouth opening 7.Patients with increased risk of aspiration 8.Patients with BMI > 30kg/m2 9.Patients with abnormal or distorted anatomy of oropharynx

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
1. Oropharyngeal seal pressure 2. Ease of placement of device 3. Position of the ventilating orifice in relation to the larynx using fibreoptic bronchoscope. 4.Ease of removal of device Timepoint: 1. Oropharyngeal seal pressure 2. Ease of placement of device 3. Position of the ventilating orifice in relation to the larynx using fibreoptic bronchoscope. 4.Ease of removal of device—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1.Hemodynamic response, SpO2, EtCO2 2.Incidence of postoperative complications graded as mild, moderate and severe. Timepoint: 1.Hemodynamic parameters will be monitored in the following time interval-Basal before premedication, at the time of insertion,1 min,2 mins,5 minutes after insertion and at the time of removal ,1 min and 5 mins after removal of the device. 2.Postoperative airway morbidities â?? sore throat, dysphagia, hoarseness of voice after 2hrs and 24hrs of surgery.—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Shalini A

Mysore medical college and research institute

shalinianand20@gmail.com9986061614

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026