Skip to content

Comparison of Effectiveness of Image Based Counselling and Conventional Oral Counselling about the Patients Disease given in Primary Eye Care Center to Attend the Tertiary Eye Hospital for Further Treatment.

Impact of Counselling based on Fundus Photography as Compared with Conventional Oral Counselling in Patients with Posterior Segment Diseases on their Presentation Rates at Base Hospital.

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2022/07/043827
Enrollment
350
Registered
2022-07-07
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2022-08-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: H350- Background retinopathy and retinalvascular changes Health Condition 2: H32- Chorioretinal disorders in diseases classified elsewhere Health Condition 3: H400- Glaucoma suspect Health Condition 4: H338- Other retinal detachments Health Condition 5: H348- Other retinal vascular occlusions

Interventions

Intervention1: Fundus Photography Counselling Arm: The ophthalmic technician in the primary eye care center will do the counselling by showing the fundus photos of the patients to them and explain ab

Sponsors

Aravind Eye Hospital
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Newly identified / suspected to have any posterior segment pathology including glaucoma, diabetic retinopathy, ARMD, vein occlusions, disc edema etc.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Patient already seen at the base eye hospital for any reason. 2. Known case of posterior segment disease on treatment either at base hospital or elsewhere. 3. Patients not willing for fundus photography.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To compare the response rate, adherence to referrals of patients with posterior segment diseases from vision centers to the base hospital after being counselled with their own fundus photograph findings vs. conventional oral counselling.Timepoint: 6 months.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. To assess the patientsâ?? understanding of the disease with either of the counselling methods. 2. To assess the accuracy of the diagnosis made at the vision centers by the ophthalmic technician as compared to the diagnosis of the doctor doing teleconsultation. 3. To assess the accuracy of the diagnosis made at the vision centers by the ophthalmic technician, as compared to the diagnosis of the doctor at base hospital. 4. To assess the accuracy of the diagnosis made at the vision centers by the ophthalmologist doing teleconsultation as compared to the diagnosis of the doctor at base hospital. 5. To assess the reasons for not visiting the base hospital upon referral. 6. Evaluation of satisfaction levels on the examination process at VC. Timepoint: 6 months.

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr S Vijay Antony

Aravind Eye Hospital

kavitha@aravind.org9894611575

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026