Skip to content

ease of Subclavian central venous line insertion by Ultrasound guidance versus landmark guided method: a prospective observational studyâ??

â??Ultrasound- versus landmark-guided subclavian vein catheterization: a prospective observational studyâ??

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2022/07/043694
Enrollment
80
Registered
2022-07-05
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2023-03-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: T149- Unspecified injury

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Dr Sujit Kshirsagar
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients will be selected from ICU for SCV cannulation after assessment by senior faculty. Critically ill patients from 18 to 65 years of age, of either gender will be selected. Indications for CVC insertion will be following: hemodynamic monitoring, treatments with vasopressors or any drug likely to induce phlebitis, haemodialysis, requirement of multiple drug infusions simultaneously.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Life-threatening conditions requiring an emergency CVC positioning will be excluded.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The primary aim is to evaluate the ease of subclavian central venous cannulation in critically ill patients between two techniques.Timepoint: immediately measured time for insertion of central venous line

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
to evaluate the number of attempts, cannulation failure, and mechanical complications which if developsTimepoint: 5 minutes after the procedure

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Sujit Kshirsagar

B.J. Medical College and sassoon general hospitals, Pune

bjsujit@gmail.com09022177719

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 9, 2026