FindTrial
Sign In

significance of TRUS and MRI in complex fistula in ano

Comparative evaluation of Transrectal Ultrasonography (TRUS) and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) in the management of complex fistula in ano by Ksharsutra Therapy

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2022/07/043623
Enrollment
120
Registered
2022-07-01
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2022-08-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K603- Anal fistula

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Department of Shalya Tantra
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1.Fistulae which are anatomically higher in extension (such as high intersphincteric, high transsphincteric or suprasphincteric fistulae) 2.Involve significant portions of the sphincter musculature ( >50%) 3.Fistulae with multiple tracks or distant cutaneous extensions 4.Anterior fistula in ano in females 5.Recurrent fistulae

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1.Simple fistula in ano. 2.Non cryptoglandular fistula in ano 3.Extrasphincteric fistulae 4.Patients suffering with following ailments shall not be taken for the study: a.Uncontrolled Hypertension b.Coronary Artery Disease c.Uncontrolled Diabetes Mellitus d.Severe Anaemia and hypoproteinemia e.Carcinoma f.HIV g.HBsAg , Anti HCV

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Diagnostic acuuracy of TRUS and MRITimepoint: baseline and upto 06 months—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
RecurrenceTimepoint: at 3 months and 5 months—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactANIL KUMAR

Institute of Medical sciences, Banaras Hindu University

dranilkumar46@gmail.com8948538522

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026