FindTrial
Sign In

To Compare 2LA in dentistry

Anesthetic efficacy of 4 % Articaine buccal infiltration versus 2% lignocaine inferior alveolar nerve block in lower primary molars indicated for endodontic treatment.

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2022/06/043611
Enrollment
44
Registered
2022-06-30
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2022-10-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K029- Dental caries, unspecified

Interventions

Intervention1: 4 % Articaine buccal infiltration injection for endodontic treatment of lower primary molars: 1.8ml of 4% articaine with 1:100,000 adrenaline as Buccal infiltration with a standard asp

Sponsors

SGT University
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1.Children of age 4-8 years 2.Indicated for pulpotomy/pulpectomy in mandibular primary molars

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1.Medically compromised patient 2.Any known allergy to local anesthetic agents

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To evaluate and compare the anaesthetic efficacy of 4 % articaine buccal infiltration versus 2% lignocaine inferior alveolar nerve block in lower primary molars indicated for endodontic treatmentTimepoint: Clinical evaluation at baseline,4 weeks—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
ââ?¬Â¢ To evaluate pain and discomfort of the patient during anaesthesia with 4% articaine buccal infiltration and 2% lidocaine inferior alveolar nerve blockTimepoint: Clinical Evaluation at baseline,4 weeks—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactSnigdha Trivedi

SGT University

ankit.srivastav@sgtuniversity.org8130023844

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026