FindTrial
Sign In

Comparison of segmental spinal and lumbar spinal anaesthesia for Endoscopic surgery for kidney stone removal

Comparison of low thoracic segmental spinal anaesthesia and lumbar spinal anaesthesia for PCNL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2022/06/043446
Enrollment
30
Registered
2022-06-23
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2022-10-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: N20- Calculus of kidney and ureter Health Condition 2: O- Medical and Surgical

Interventions

Intervention1: Isobaric ropivacaine 0.75%: For low thoracic segmental anaesthesia Control Intervention1: Hyperbaric ropivacaine 0.75%: For lumbar spinal anaesthesia

Sponsors

JNUIMSRC
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Covid negative patients

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: BMI > 37kgm2 Pregnant and lactating females Bleeding disorders Local site infections

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Onset and duration of motor and sensory block Hemodynamic variations Any intraoperative and postoperative side effectTimepoint: At 5 min interval, during PCNL surgery—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Time of rescue analgesia Surgeon and patient satisfaction scoreTimepoint: The time at which rescue analgesia is required (vas3) will be noted and compared. Surgeon and patient satisfaction score in both the techniques will be compared.—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Swati choudhary

JNUIMSRC, Jaipur

drswati90@gmail.com9460861238

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026