Clinical Evaluation of three different tooth filling materials.

Clinical Evaluation of three different restorative materials in class 5 non carious cervical lesions: An in vivo six months follow up study.

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 2

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2022/06/043300

Enrollment

Registered

2022-06-16

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2022-06-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K031- Abrasion of teeth

Interventions

Intervention1: Restoration of class 5 non carious cervical lesion of teeth: Three different restorative materials to be used for Restoration of class 5 non carious cervical lesion of teeth and compari

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1.Vital teeth with fair oral hygiene 2.patients with 3 consecutive non carious cervical lesion and teeth with in occlusion 3.patients with age between 20â??60 years

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1.Evidence of parafunctional tooth wear 2.Caries 3.Discoloration of teeth 4.Poor oral hygiene

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
cavosurface margin discoloration is evident in Zirconomer improved.Timepoint: 15 days	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
There is significant difference evident in color match and marginal integrity amongst three restorative materials.(cention N, Giomer and Zirconomer improved)Timepoint: 3 months	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactKruti Yagnik

College of Dental Science and Research Centre

krutiyagnik97@gmail.com9426357553

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026