Skip to content

Comparison of different devices to secure airway for intubation in manikin with difficult airway by experienced doctors

COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT VIDEO LARYNGOSCOPES FOR NASOTRACHEAL INTUBATION IN MANIKIN WITH DIFFICULT AIRWAY BY EXPERIENCED ANAESTHESIOLOGIST: A RANDOMISED, SELF CONTROLLED, CROSSOVER TRIAL

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2022/05/042821
Enrollment
20
Registered
2022-05-26
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2022-10-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Control Intervention1: C- MAC: VIDOE LARYNGOSCOPE Control Intervention2: DIRECT LARYNGOSCOPE: MACINTOSH DIRECT LARYNGOSCOPE BLADE 3

Sponsors

AIIMS HOSPITAL
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: ANAESTHESIOLOGIST HAVING 3 YEARS OF EXPERIENCE

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: ANAESTHESIOLOGIST WITH LESS THAN 3 YEARS OF EXPERIENCE

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Compare three different kind of laryngoscopes (Macintosh, Cmac, Kings vision) with respect to intubation characteristics in nasotracheal intubation on manikinTimepoint: At baseline (just after intubation attempt)

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Compare time of intubation in normal and difficult airway with three different kind of laryngoscopeTimepoint: At baseline (just after intubation attempt);To assess failed intubation in normal and difficult airway with three different kind of laryngoscopes.Timepoint: At baseline (just after intubation attempt);To compare force applied during intubation in both normal and difficult airway with three different kind of laryngoscopes.Timepoint: At baseline (just after intubation attempt)

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Nishkarsh Gupta

AIIMS, New Delhi

drnishkarsh@rediffmail.com

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026