Skip to content

To compare efficacy of radiofrequency thermocoagulation of ganglion Impar versus block using a combination of local anaesthetic and steroid in chronic perineal pain patients and to assess pain relief and patient’s self reported belief about the efficacy of treatment

Comparison of radiofrequency thermocoagulation of ganglion Impar versus block using a combination of local anaesthetic and steroid in chronic perineal pain

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2022/05/042716
Enrollment
40
Registered
2022-05-20
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-01-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: R102- Pelvic and perineal pain

Interventions

Intervention1: Conventional radiofrequency treatment (RFT) of ganglion Impar: A 10cm 22 G radiofrequency needle with 5 mm active tip will be introduced under fluoroscopic guidance through the dorsal s

Sponsors

Pt B D Sharma PGIMS
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Forty patients of either sex in the age group of 20-70 years suffering from chronic perineal pain will be enrolled in the study. Patients fulfilling all the three criteria will be included in the study: 1) history, physical examination and pain pattern consistent with chronic perineal pain, 2) the cause of chronic perineal pain being benign in nature with malignancy ruled out and 3) failure to respond to six weeks of conservative treatment with a combination of analgesics, anti-inflammatory drugs, neuromodulators and physiotherapy.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients with 1) Known contraindications for nerve blocks in sacrococcygeal area 2) Active perineal infection 3) Acute perineal trauma 4) History of perineal malignancies 5) History of adverse reactions to local anaesthetics or steroids 6) Previous history of ganglion Impar blocks 7) Previous surgery for in perineal region 8) Uncontrolled diabetes mellitus 9) Anticoagulants intake 10) Pregnancy will be excluded from the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Assessment of pain using pain scoreTimepoint: Thirty minutes before the procedure Thirty minutes after the procedure Two weeks after the procedure One month after the procedure Three months after the procedure

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Timepoint: Patient global impression of change will be assessed two weeks, one month and three months after the procedure

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Vaishali Phogat

Pt. B. D. Sharma, PGIMS

drnaveenmalhotra@yahoo.co.in9812091051

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026