Skip to content

It is the study comparing the conventional landmark technique of spinal anaesthesia with that of ultrasound assisted technique in overweight patients undergoing elective lower abdomen surgeries

Comparison of Real time Ultrasound Guided Spinal Anaesthesia versus conventional landmark guided midline approach in obese patients posted for elective lower abdominal surgeries

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2022/05/042556
Enrollment
40
Registered
2022-05-13
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2022-05-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical

Interventions

Intervention1: using ultrasound guidance: ultrasound can be used to identify the subarachnoid space in obese patients to reduce the number of attempts taken to get a positive CSF tap Control Intervent

Sponsors

Dr VINUTH K MURTHY
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: ASA physical status 1 and 2 of either sex scheduled for infraumbilical surgeries

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Gross spinal deformities History of perineural neuropathy Sepsis at site of infection Coagulopathy History of allergies to LA and opiods Emergency cases Pregnant and lactating females

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Comparison of Real time Ultrasound Guided Spinal Anaesthesia versus conventional landmark guided midline approach in obese patients posted for elective lower abdominal surgeries. The number of attempts taken is the primary objectiveTimepoint: Comparison of Real time Ultrasound Guided Spinal Anaesthesia versus conventional landmark guided midline approach in obese patients posted for elective lower abdominal surgeries. time taken for successful lumbar puncture is compared. 6 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
number of passes, time taken for successful lumbar puncture and incidence of complications are taken into considerationTimepoint: studies for 6 months

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Vinuth K Murthy

KIMS Hospital, Bangalore

vinuthkmurthy@gmail.com9483949270

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026