FindTrial
Sign In

A study comparing two devices(Baska Mask and Ambu Aurgain) for providing breaths for patients undergoing surgery in which patients will be divided into two groups randomly.

Randomized comparison of BASKA mask versus AMBU auragain for airway management of surgical patients

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2022/05/042544
Enrollment
74
Registered
2022-05-13
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2023-02-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical

Interventions

Intervention1: Group A (Ambu Aurgain) : Patients airway will be managed using Ambu Aurgain after induction of anaesthesia till recovery of anesthesia Control Intervention1: Group B (Baska Mask): Pati

Sponsors

Surbhi Rampal
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I and II, planned for elective surgery under general anesthesia using supraglottic airway device will be included in this study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Anticipated difficult airway 2. Patients not giving consent 3. Patients with cardiac diseases, lung disorders 4. Patients planned for thoracic or cardiovascular, head and neck surgery 5. Obese patients(BMI more than equal to 30 kilogram per metre square) 6. Pregnant patients 7. Expected duration of surgery more than two hours 8. Risk of gastric aspiration 9. gastroparesis, gastro esophageal reflux disease, intestinal obstruction

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Oropharyngeal Leak PressureTimepoint: Oropharyngeal leak pressure will be measured only once immediately after the confirmation of successful placement of supraglottic airway device. It will be measured only once.—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Complications after usage of supraglottic airway deviceTimepoint: After completion of surgery and emergence from anesthesia;Ease of insertion of supraglottic airway deviceTimepoint: After insertion of supraglottic airway device;Fibreoptic view of larynx through the supraglottic airway deviceTimepoint: After insertion of supraglottic airway device;leak fraction during ventilation using supraglottic airway deviceTimepoint: After confirmation of supraglottic airway device placement;Number of insertion attempts taken to insert supraglottic airway deviceTimepoint: After confirmation of supraglottic airway device;Supraglottic airway device insertion timeTimepoint: During insertion of supraglottic airway device—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactSurbhi Rampal

King Georges Medical University

ramanrajesh83@gmail.com9451564339

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026